Use this page to report stale vendor claims, broken routes, missing source context, accessibility issues, or commercial questions that should stay outside editorial scoring at Work AI Brief.
Use the form below when a tool page, workflow explainer, or comparison needs review because a product changed, a vendor claim no longer holds, a verified-vs-unverified boundary is unclear, or a route no longer sends readers to the strongest next page.
Best path by issue
- Correction or stale data: page URL, affected statement, and the source or data that changed.
- Coverage question: page URL, what context is missing, and why the current framing is incomplete.
- Commercial disclosure: company name, request type, and the page or placement involved.
- Accessibility issue: page URL, device or browser, and the interaction that broke.
What helps us review a correction faster
- Send the exact page URL and the statement that needs review.
- Include the primary source, release, or evidence that changes the meaning of the page.
- Explain whether the issue affects timing, scope, math, sourcing, or reader risk.
How the queue is handled
We aim to acknowledge factual correction requests within 3 business days.
Editorial independence
Commercial requests, sponsorship questions, and editorial corrections are reviewed separately. A partnership request does not guarantee coverage, ranking movement, softer risk language, or a positive conclusion.
Email: admin@workaibrief.com